Germany’s Reich Nature Protection Law (Reichsnaturschutzgesetz) grew
from a Volkisch movement born in the 19th Century, nourished by
botanists and biologists at Jena University. Those who held a political
bent, like Ernest Haeckel, integrated ‘ecology’ with social systems.
Today ecology has been integrated with the Common Core State Standards.
“Haeckel held that civilization and the life of nations are governed
by the same laws as prevail throughout nature and organic life” (Quoted
in Gasman, The Scientific Origins of National Socialism, p. 34).
Later, naturalism was grafted into German National Socialism, mixed
with ‘blut and boden’ (blood & soil). After WWII, an ‘ecology’
movement branched throughout the world. The UN’s Decade for Sustainable
Development, as in Germany, is not merely content in actions for clean
air and water. They strive toward raising new values and behavior toward
greener politically correct bodies, minds and souls.
Most Americans would have no reasonable objection to incorporating
conservation in schooling, nationally or globally. The confusion lies in
the gap between ‘environmental education and ‘sustainable education’.
Environmental education only changes wasteful habits and are comfortably
fit in a science or health class. Sustainable education changes habits
of mind; values, behavior, principles, loyalties, a child’s worldview.
It can be measured objectively by an observer and is intended to be
integrated across the disciplines. The Common Core Curriculum is
‘skilled based only’, content and culture-free’ 1, a
framework ripe for politically correctness. Content covering social
justice, ecological economics and environmental literacy is found at the
US Partnership, version 3 October Sustainability Standards for Grades
K-12. Its successful development would be “the creation of a new people”
(Rousseau: Social Contract)
A stamp of approval for Oregon’s sustainable solutions was printed on Oregon House Bill 2544 (2009), nicknamed The No Child Left Inside Act.
Oregon’s Environmental Literacy Plan (OELP) was born. The stakeholders
listed in the plan include the US Partnership’s Sustainable Standards
for Grades K-12 and the North American Association for Environmental
Education (NAAEE). The OELP specifically states:
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY STRANDS AND GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS – To be effective, education for environmental literacy needs to be integrated throughout the curriculum in every classroom in Oregon
with connected, sustained opportunities for students to participate in
outdoor learning experiences. To facilitate this process, Environmental
Literacy Strands were developed that articulate a comprehensive content
and skills learning framework (see Chapter 3).
Both environmental and sustainability standards have been steered to
Oregon via two avenues; The North American Association for Environmental
Education (NAAEE), supported by the EPA, and the US Partnership
Standards, commissioned by the UN Decade for Sustainable Development.
The No Child Left Behind Act controversy provided a perfect smoke screen
for the No Child Left Inside Act, and if one reads all the indicators
formulated by the Cloud Institute, one can understand why they were
hidden- in Cloud 9.
Oregon has integrated (aligned) the global sustainability standards and
the Cloud’s indicators into the common core standards for all grades
and disciplines. http://www.ode.state.or.us/teachlearn/specialty/alt/eltf…
The NAAEE’s mission is to align environmental standards with the Common
Core, which is rarely mentioned in the social media’s Common Core
culture war. Courtesy of the Zero Waste Alliance, Oregon’s role in
shaping new minds is managed by the Sustainable Schools Collaborative. http://sustainableschools.org/topic-resources/education-for-sustainability (Quotes in italics from their site)
The United Nations: Education for Sustainable Development (ESD)
Agenda 21, the plan developed at the Rio Earth Summit, included an
implementation section which delves into education for sustainability:
Chapter 36, “Promoting Education, Public Awareness and Training”.
Education was considered to be so important that it was the only means
singled out in 2002 for a United Nations Decade. The U.N. Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is serving as the lead
agency of this Decade for Education for Sustainable Development
(2005-2014), and nations are being encouraged to establish their own
Decade-oriented initiatives.
The international implementation plan for the Decade asserts that
Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) should not be equated with
environmental education, but rather encompass it and go beyond it, or
that ESD cannot be taught as an independent subject, but should be
infused throughout the curriculum and the disciplines.
The US initiative for the Decade, was founded in 2003. It is a grass
roots movement working outside of federal government policy and
priorities. It is managed by an executive team, and built on the work of
action teams and sector teams (including higher education, K-12, faith
community, youth, and living institutions).
Congressional actions on environmental education are on the books.
Education for Sustainability maybe the devil in the details as the
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) published Designs for the Future of Environmental Education,
1981. The first federal law on ‘environmental education’ was enacted in
1970, but sat hibernating in the Office of Health, Education and
Welfare. In 1990, a re-enacted National Environmental Education Act was
passed, providing for “training, field studies, programs and curriculum
for dissemination” by the Office of Environmental Education within the
EPA. The Office shall “manage Federal grant assistance provided to local
education agencies, institutions of higher education, other
not-for-profit organizations, and noncommercial education broadcasting
entities”. [Sect: 4(b)(5): Public Law 101-619- Nov. 16, 101st Congress]
Non-profit growth bloomed and set out to pollinate the states.
Executive team? Actions teams? Outside governing authorities? This is a
democracy, isn’t it? The only way to stop global education is to start
locally, in your school district, with action teams.
—————
1 ‘Fair to Middling’, by J. K. Milgram, S. Stotsky, Common Core Validation Committee members; Pioneer Institute.